VOTE LOW IMMIGRATION

Which Parties Are For Low Immigration In 2025?

PUT THESE PARTIES FIRST

I’ve done the research. If you want to get immigration DOWN, vote for the parties above and put the MAJORS LAST.

COPY AND SHARE THE IMAGE – IT’S FREE

Say NO to a Big Australia

STAY UNDER 30 MILLION

END THE AUSTRALIA-INDIA MIGRATION & MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP ‘AGREEMENT’

It’s your choice.

Your PREFERENCES are yours.

Swamping The Country – Vote To Stop It

If your priority this election is to send the message that you’re fed up with mass immigration you didn’t ask for, preference the parties in the image above in the order they appear; Sustainable Australia, Vote Planet, Democracy First, People First (Gerard Rennick), One Nation, Great Australian, Libertarian and then any others and then put the majors last.

You’ll be able to do that for the Senate ballot paper, depending on which state you’re in. (In the Victorian Senate, look carefully for the Vote Planet logo – a black image of the world – it appears inside the Fusion Party logo – a purple doughnut – as in the image above.) However, the House of Representatives ballot will have fewer of these parties. Look for Democracy First candidates using their logo inside the Fusion doughnut logo, especially if you’re in Victoria. Be warned; some Fusion Party candidates are for high immigration, so identifying the logo is important.

The first three parties (SAP, VP & DF) are basically socially in the sensible centre with post-growth economic policies that help reduce inequality (see How A History Scientist Votes). People First is similar, but climate-change denying. The following three (ON, GAP & L) are socially right wing and economically right wing. Given the current trend in polls indicating the major parties will maintain their majority status in the next parliament it is crucial to do everything possible to prevent it. The reason being that they will be able to block changes to the electoral system that they recently rigged in their favour with the Electoral Reform Bill. From 2027, it will be ever more difficult to unseat them.

You have to number every box on the ballot paper for the House of Representatives. Depending on where you’re voting, you’ll probably need to decide who put before the major parties (LNP, Labor and Greens). Look below at the research I’ve done on almost all parties and candidates – where they’ll running and what their position on immigration is . You can do your own research and Build A Ballot is a great website for this. (If you need help with election words – jargon – go HERE.)

WHY PUT THE MAJORS LAST?

As for the order you list the four major parties at the end (Green Labor, Liberal, National), keep this in mind: The rule of thumb should be to put the incumbent (your current MP) at the very end. So for example, if your electorate has a Labor member of parliament, put Labor last, even if you tend to vote Labor. The purpose of this is to get as many MPs on as razor thin a margin of support as possible so that they will be more responsive to their constituents during their term in office rather than their party. This will also help create a hung parliament, which will be more accountable to voters. It helps reduce the power of parliament (which has become fire-walled from low immigration advocates, among other things), shakes it up a bit and keeps MPs on their toes. This is natural when a society is going through a transitional period. It increases the pressure on MPs from different perspectives to negotiate a range of party policies and reach compromises. This is necessary when structural reform is required.

Countering The Crap

ISN’T IMMIGRATION FALLING ANYWAY?

There is more talk in the news about the immigration rate number ‘correcting itself’. This is what they said when it blew out in 2022 and 2023 – it was just making up for the COVID dip. The underlying premise in these reports is that increasing Australia’s population of immigrants by about 240,000 people per year is normal. It’s not. Since 2005 Australia’s immigration rate has been among highest in the OECD countries – at third world rates of population growth. 70,000 is the historical average.

Is Immigration More Important Than Climate Change?

Yes. Immigration is happening a thousand times faster than climate change. It is also more difficult to reverse. Nature rebounds but a bloated population and damaged culture doesn’t quite so effortlessly. Voting for a climate denying party that calls for reducing immigration to Australia is justifiable because lower immigration will more immediately and quantifably prevent emissions going up on a net annual basis, depending on the reduction. It will help stop Australia’s carbon emissions going up and the world’s because Australia is the highest per capita emitter. Every extra person who arrives in Australia and takes up our high-carbon emitting lifestyle adds needlessly to the world’s total emissions. It will be harder to get Australians to adopt a lower carbon emitting lifestyle if they are dealing with the effects of unwanted mass immigration. Mass immigration is anything above 100K NOM (net overseas migration) per year. The long-term historical average for Australia before 2005 was 70K NOM per year.

Does Mass Immigration Help Redistribute Global Wealth?

No. It does the opposite. Most people who can afford to come to Australia (we stopped the boats) are upgrading their lifestyles from more polluted and crowded cities to our comparatively less crowded and polluted cities, hence making them more crowded and polluted. While there is a marginal shift in wealth downwards to these people internationally, it exacerbates the wealth disparity within the domestic population. The middle class become poorer while the wealthy become wealthier. In other words, it turbocharges the wealth pump.

Perhaps the most financially and socially ruinous effect of mass immigration is how unaffordable it is making housing. We all know about this, but Alan Kohler’s latest video explains it succinctly:

Housing By The Numbers ABC video on Youtube

The Danish experience is fortuitous. Its left-wing government lost ground to right wing parties when immigration got out of control. People voted for anti-immigration parties while holding their noses. Then the left-wing government cracked down on immigration and reversed its declining popularity.

The Details; Who, What & Where.

This is a list of parties with the lowest immigration targets. I have reviewed every party standing in the upcoming election across the country. I’ve ranked them from best to worst on immigration, with a brief quote. The list includes their candidates according to their location.

LIST FROM BEST TO WORST ACROSS THE COUNTRY