Equanimity

Holistic local sustainability; food, water, energy, money, people

Rethink Big Australia Plebiscite

Australia is at a crucial juncture. The pandemic resulted in two years of very slight population growth (due to births). Not since 1916 during WWI has anything like this occurred. Australians now have the rarest of opportunities to assess the value of a stable population.

For decades federal governments have foisted recklessly fast immigration-driven population growth on the Australian public. Politicians can no longer claim this is ‘inevitable’ and ‘unstoppable’, as PM Scott Morrison said. They are clearly choosing a policy that most Australians oppose (Figure 8). They oppose it for many reasons; see extended article.

TAPRI October 2021 Report https://tapri.org.au

The Coalition’s call for a return to high (or even higher) immigration levels before the 2022 federal election potentially made immigration an election issue. But the ALP kept quiet, hinting it would take a different route (skills training at home).

The RBA , the ACTU and sections of the media appear to be seeing the benefits for wage-earners and those seeking work. Allan Kohler recently wrote that immigration policy is “the most material economic decision to be made by whoever wins the next election.”

Sign the Change.org petition HERE.

Please donate to SPA HERE.

High levels of immigration sustained over many years is a hugely transformative policy, and yet no legislation is required because Cabinet alone decides the quota for new arrivals.

Many people leave Australia each year. We could take in the same number. Even then births would keep Australia’s population rising for decades. Refugees have made up only 5-10% of Australia’s immigration in recent years. This could be increased even with zero net migration.

Calling on the Coalition to hold a plebiscite alongside the 2022 election would have helped concentrate attention on the issue during the campaign. Parliamentary resistance can be used to point to the lack of support for the policy. The cost savings of running a plebiscite during an federal election are compelling.

Is there enough support for a plebiscite to succeed? Certainly not in parliament. The Big Australia advocates – powerful wealthy donors – have captured both major parties and the Greens don’t need to be captured. They have had their way for too long. It’s time ALL Australians were taken into account, including all our other species. Let’s set an example to the world and do our bit to help save the planet.

Let’s rethink Big Australia – Sustainable Population Australia

Let’s raise the profile of this discussion, and make it okay to talk about. Please spread this message.

6 comments on “Rethink Big Australia Plebiscite

  1. Pingback: December Population News | Equanimity

  2. George Paris
    January 19, 2022

    Shouldn’t we debate the optimum population and aim for it ?

    Like

    • Equanimity Foundation
      January 19, 2022

      Indeed, not nearly enough people are educated about what carrying capacity is and why it matters, even though we had a debate in the 1990s and the result was found to be around 22 million people. Technology has improved but the environment has deteriorated and the population increased. I can send you a copy of the December 1994 Parliamentary REPORT BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STANDING COMMITTEE FOR LONG TERM STRATEGIES but it’s available online – just search the above terms.

      Like

      • don james owers
        January 22, 2022

        and even back then most submissions opposed higher populations

        Like

  3. Pingback: Rethink Big Australia petition | Equanimity

Leave a comment

Information

This entry was posted on November 27, 2021 by .